Login
User Name:

Password:



Register
Forgot your password?
Vote for Us!
Development
Nov 28, 2018, 10:10 am
By Keirath
First Immortal
Oct 12, 2018, 12:02 pm
By GatewaySysop
Bug in do_climb( )
Jun 5, 2018, 5:31 pm
By joeyfogas
question on overland code
May 31, 2018, 10:03 am
By joeyfogas
KaVir's Protocol Snip
May 15, 2018, 7:57 pm
By joeyfogas
tintin++ ogg sound player script for linux
Author: Robert Smith
Submitted by: Vladaar
6Dragons ogg Soundpack
Author: Vladaar
Submitted by: Vladaar
6Dragons 4.4
Author: Vladaar
Submitted by: Vladaar
LoP 1.46
Author: Remcon
Submitted by: Remcon
LOP 1.45
Author: Remcon
Submitted by: Remcon
Users Online
CommonCrawl, DotBot, Yandex

Members: 0
Guests: 18
Stats
Files
Topics
Posts
Members
Newest Member
481
3,740
19,397
632
ClarenceKe
Today's Birthdays
There are no member birthdays today.
Related Links
» SmaugMuds.org » Codebases » SWFOTE FUSS » Confused by version numbers
Forum Rules | Mark all | Recent Posts

Confused by version numbers
< Newer Topic :: Older Topic >

Pages:<< prev 1 next >>
Post is unread #1 Feb 8, 2006, 3:52 am
Go to the top of the page
Go to the bottom of the page

enderandrew

GroupMembers
Posts8
JoinedFeb 8, 2006

Which would be considered the more current version, SWFotE 2.1 or SWFotE:FUSS 1.3?

1.3 looks like it was released more recently. Was this an early fork of SWFotE with a recent update?

Does SWFotE:FUSS build on all of the updates that 2.0 and 2.1 got?

Thanks!
       
Post is unread #2 Feb 8, 2006, 4:32 am
Go to the top of the page
Go to the bottom of the page

Samson
Black Hand
GroupAdministrators
Posts3,644
JoinedJan 1, 2002

The FUSS package was started from the stock FOTE 1.1 package with whatever Tawnos and them had in it at the time. It has nothing to do with the 2.x fork other than any common bugfixes between them. None of the extra features of 2.0 or 2.1 are included since this is intended to remain as close to stock as practical.
       
Post is unread #3 Feb 8, 2006, 5:44 pm
Go to the top of the page
Go to the bottom of the page

Samson
Black Hand
GroupAdministrators
Posts3,644
JoinedJan 1, 2002

BTW - I'd just like to point out for the record that my main fear in raising a version number has indeed come to pass. People have begun expressing confusion over the act of having done so - which is something I more or less expected and was a contributing factor to why it hadn't been done before. I'd like for folks to keep this in mind in the future if another such version bump is desired. I dislike confusing people. Especially when it unintentionally misleads them into thinking the particular package is "the best" or "most current available" for the particular base.
       
Pages:<< prev 1 next >>