Login
User Name:

Password:



Register
Forgot your password?
Vote for Us!
Couple bugs
Dec 12, 2017, 5:42 pm
By Remcon
Bug in disarm( )
Nov 12, 2017, 6:54 pm
By GatewaySysop
Bug in will_fall( )
Oct 23, 2017, 1:35 am
By GatewaySysop
Bug in do_zap( ), do_brandish( )
Oct 18, 2017, 1:52 pm
By GatewaySysop
Bug in get_exp_worth( )
Oct 10, 2017, 1:26 am
By GatewaySysop
LOP 1.45
Author: Remcon
Submitted by: Remcon
LOP Heroes Edition
Author: Vladaar
Submitted by: Vladaar
Heroes sound extras
Author: Vladaar
Submitted by: Vladaar
6Dragons 4.3
Author: Vladaar
Submitted by: Vladaar
Memwatch
Author: Johan Lindh
Submitted by: Vladaar
Users Online
CommonCrawl, Sogou, Bing, DotBot, Yandex, Google

Members: 0
Guests: 9
Stats
Files
Topics
Posts
Members
Newest Member
477
3,705
19,232
608
LAntorcha
Today's Birthdays
There are no member birthdays today.
Related Links
» SmaugMuds.org » Codebases » AFKMud Support & Development » Random Treasure System
Forum Rules | Mark all | Recent Posts

Random Treasure System
< Newer Topic :: Older Topic > W X Y Z resets

Pages:<< prev 1 next >>
Post is unread #1 Aug 26, 2013, 1:29 pm
Go to the top of the page
Go to the bottom of the page

Matteo2303
Apprentice
GroupMembers
Posts57
JoinedAug 25, 2003

I'm porting AFKMUD random-treasure system from C++ to C Smaug
I notice that in AFKMUD codebase are added some specific random resets:
Z like (O)bject, "W" like (P)ut, X like (E)quip and Y like (G)ive...
But why? Isn't more simple use standard O, P, E, and G and check if the reset object is OBJ_VNUM_TREASURE ?
In this case we need just add some reset args to (O), (P), (E) and (G) for control generate_random. Same result but with more semplicity I think.

bye
matteo
       
Post is unread #2 Aug 26, 2013, 5:45 pm
Go to the top of the page
Go to the bottom of the page

Remcon
Geomancer
GroupAdministrators
Posts1,858
JoinedJul 26, 2005

well there are different amounts of arguments for each of the new ones
       
Post is unread #3 Aug 28, 2013, 12:31 am
Go to the top of the page
Go to the bottom of the page

Matteo2303
Apprentice
GroupMembers
Posts57
JoinedAug 25, 2003


Remcon said:

well there are different amounts of arguments for each of the new ones


Yes, but imho is much better and simple add optional args to standard G, E, P, O rather than adding new W, Z, X, Y.

However I notice another thing in do_socket function:
stralloc_printf( &item->socket[0], "%s", capitalize( arg ).c_str(  ) );


I don't know if it is wanted but in this case if I have a rune called "Test" and a player digits "socked tes" the socket[0] assume "Tes" name and not "Test". Isn't better use rune->name?

Bye!
       
Post is unread #4 Aug 28, 2013, 12:26 pm
Go to the top of the page
Go to the bottom of the page

Remcon
Geomancer
GroupAdministrators
Posts1,858
JoinedJul 26, 2005

I agree lol.
       
Pages:<< prev 1 next >>