Login
User Name:

Password:



Register
Forgot your password?
Vote for Us!
parse description bug
Dec 15, 2017, 10:08 pm
By Remcon
Couple bugs
Dec 12, 2017, 5:42 pm
By Remcon
Bug in disarm( )
Nov 12, 2017, 6:54 pm
By GatewaySysop
Bug in will_fall( )
Oct 23, 2017, 1:35 am
By GatewaySysop
Bug in do_zap( ), do_brandish( )
Oct 18, 2017, 1:52 pm
By GatewaySysop
LOP 1.45
Author: Remcon
Submitted by: Remcon
LOP Heroes Edition
Author: Vladaar
Submitted by: Vladaar
Heroes sound extras
Author: Vladaar
Submitted by: Vladaar
6Dragons 4.3
Author: Vladaar
Submitted by: Vladaar
Memwatch
Author: Johan Lindh
Submitted by: Vladaar
Users Online
CommonCrawl, DotBot, Yandex, Sogou, Yahoo!

Members: 0
Guests: 7
Stats
Files
Topics
Posts
Members
Newest Member
477
3,706
19,240
608
LAntorcha
Today's Birthdays
There are no member birthdays today.
Related Links
» SmaugMuds.org » Codebases » SmaugFUSS » Small annoyance
Forum Rules | Mark all | Recent Posts

Small annoyance
< Newer Topic :: Older Topic > anti-augurer/paladin/ranger

Pages:<< prev 1 next >>
Post is unread #1 Apr 13, 2003, 2:54 am
Go to the top of the page
Go to the bottom of the page

Zhamel

GroupMembers
Posts68
JoinedApr 5, 2005

I know pratically everyone is aware of this. For FUSS someone could "finish" the anti-class flags. Just add the item flags for augurer/paladin/ranger in mud.h and build.c, then change them in act_obj.c. For some reason paladin/ranger uses the antiwarrior flags and augurer w/mage.

I'm sure most people would want the classes to have their own flags. FUSS is suppose to be fixed up, lets do it right. :D



<!--EDIT|Zhamel|Apr 13 2003, 05:02 AM-->
       
Post is unread #2 Apr 13, 2003, 6:25 pm
Go to the top of the page
Go to the bottom of the page

Samson
Black Hand
GroupAdministrators
Posts3,639
JoinedJan 1, 2002

I'll look into this when I have some spare time. Generally FUSS is meant to remain as close to stock as possible - it's only intended to have actual bugs fixed, and the class anti thing isn't actually a bug. They did that on purpose. It's not logical, but hey. Humans rarely are :)

That said, it's still a valid idea. I just don't want to end up having a bunch of these kinds of enhancements done over time and end up with it deviated enough to be a problem. I don't have time enough to be providing that level of support. I already have a codebase :)
       
Pages:<< prev 1 next >>